[deleted]Big irresponsible internet company, my old friend, this is plainly irresponsible, undefensible and perhaps suicidal. If some Islamic nut-job flys a plane into the [deleted] reactor and it's established that he took his bearings from your directions, expect (1) the worst of political reprecussions and (2) the mother of all lawsuits. You're way out on a limb here, and as you're publically traded now, dudes, Elliot Spitzer will be on your ass like white on rice. By God I'll help him, pro bono.
Fix it now, [deleted]big irresponsible internet company, or expect big doings at your next stockholders meeting.
This is sheer idiocy.
P.S.: On a friendly note, I sure hope your accounting is in order.
*Given what you've got mate, this is clearly a losing proposition. May I suggest checkers?
3 comments:
Great line: On a friendly note, I hope your accounting is in order
On a more humorous but just as damning note, I got a kick out of reading that Google's CEO got his panties twisted when he learned that CNET googled him, and published the public info it gleaned about him. A la Russia, Google banned all interviews with CNET for a year. Something about a goose and a gander....
Of course, putting the too sensitive image at the top of the article about the availability of too sensitive photos is completely harmless.
I struggled with that, too. Should I link to the story with the photo and risk some terrorist dropping by my site and deciding to go jihad all over it? But the picture is the story, so what are you going to do? On the other hand, there is no other hand. So, I've delinked it. If you want the link, email me, and after I've run a thorough google on you, I'll send your name to the FBI.
Cheers.
Post a Comment